File
206
Document 206
AI Analysis
Summary: Ghislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that Counts One through Four of the superseding indictment should be dismissed as time-barred. The memorandum contests the retroactive application of the 2003 Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 and asserts that the charged offenses do not fall under the statute's provisions.
Significance: This document is a crucial court filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, as it presents her legal arguments for dismissing certain counts of the indictment based on statute of limitations grounds. The ruling on this motion could significantly impact the scope of the trial.
Key Topics:
Statute of limitations for Mann Act counts
Retroactivity of the 2003 Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283
Applicability of 18 U.S.C. § 3283 to the charged offenses
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Christian R. Everdell - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Laura A. Menninger - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Bobbi C. Sternheim - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell