File
202
Document 202
AI Analysis
Summary: The defense requests a trial continuance due to the government's filing of a superseding indictment that added new charges and expanded the time period of the alleged conduct. The defense argues that it needs more time to investigate and prepare for the new charges, citing the significant amount of new discovery material and the difficulties in reviewing it.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument for a trial continuance due to the government's late filing of a superseding indictment, which added new charges and expanded the scope of the case.
Key Topics:
Request for trial continuance due to superseding indictment
Impact of new charges on defense preparation
Government's discovery production and its implications
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
- Bobbi C. Sternheim - Defense Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell