File
20
Document 20-2008
AI Analysis
Summary: The document argues that the right to public access to court documents, including juror questionnaires, is essential and that delaying access undermines this right. It also asserts that the First Amendment right of access applies to these documents and that sealing them is not justified. The document is likely a court filing related to a defendant's motion for a new trial.
Significance: This document is potentially important because it discusses the right to public access to court documents, specifically juror questionnaires, and the First Amendment implications of sealing such documents.
Key Topics:
public access to court documents
juror questionnaires and their sealing
First Amendment right of access
Key People:
- Lugosch - referenced in a court decision related to public access to court documents
- Defendant - party requesting delay in access to certain documents and filing a motion for a new trial
- Juror 50 - juror whose questionnaires are relevant to the defendant's motion for a new trial