File
1616620
Document 1616620
AI Analysis
Summary: The document is a deposition transcript of Ms. Brune, discussing the team's use of a jury consultant, conversations about a juror's identity, and the team's response to new information about the juror. The testimony reveals details about the team's actions and potential inconsistencies in their statements.
Significance: This deposition transcript reveals details about the team's actions and discussions during a trial, particularly regarding a juror's identity and potential misconduct. It highlights potential inconsistencies in the team's statements and actions.
Key Topics:
Discussion about the role of jury consultants in a specific case
Conversation among team members about a juror's identity and potential connection to a suspended lawyer
Investigation into a juror's background and the team's response to new information
Key People:
- Ms. Brune - witness being deposed
- Dennis Donahue - jury consultant hired for the case
- Ms. Trzaskoma - team member involved in discussions about the juror
- Laurie Edelstein - team member involved in discussions about the juror
- Catherine Conrad - suspended attorney potentially connected to a juror