File
144
Document 144
AI Analysis
Summary: The memorandum argues that counts one through four of the superseding indictment should be dismissed as time-barred, asserting that the 2003 amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 does not apply retroactively and that the statute does not cover the offenses charged in those counts.
Significance: This document is significant because it presents Ghislaine Maxwell's legal argument for dismissing counts one through four of the superseding indictment based on statute of limitations grounds, potentially impacting the outcome of the criminal case against her.
Key Topics:
Statute of Limitations
Retroactivity of the 2003 Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283
Application of 18 U.S.C. § 3283 to the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Mark S. Cohen - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Christian R. Everdell - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Laura A. Menninger - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Bobbi C. Sternheim - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell