File
140
Document 140
AI Analysis
Summary: Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the government's subpoena to a third party was unconstitutional and violated her rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, as well as the Martindell principle. They seek to suppress evidence obtained from this subpoena and dismiss certain counts.
Significance: This document is potentially important because it presents legal arguments for suppressing evidence obtained through a grand jury subpoena, which could significantly impact the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
Key Topics:
Fourth Amendment violation due to overbroad subpoena
Martindell violation for lack of notice and opportunity to be heard
Fifth Amendment violation for self-incrimination
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Laura A. Menninger - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Mark S. Cohen - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell