File
136
Document 136
AI Analysis
Summary: The memorandum of law supports Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment, arguing that her alleged misstatements in a civil deposition were not perjurious and lacked materiality. The document provides a detailed analysis of the legal authority and factual background related to the case. It contends that the questions asked in the deposition were poorly worded and Maxwell's responses were literally truthful.
Significance: This document is significant because it presents a legal argument for dismissing two counts of perjury against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing that her statements were not perjurious as a matter of law.
Key Topics:
Motion to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment
Perjury charges against Ghislaine Maxwell
Materiality of alleged misstatements in a civil deposition
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Jeffrey Epstein - Associated individual mentioned throughout the document
- Virginia Giuffre - Plaintiff in the underlying civil defamation action