File
124
Document 124
AI Analysis
Summary: Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the Superseding Indictment is too vague, failing to identify specific dates, accusers, or details of alleged crimes, and thus violates her constitutional rights. They request that Counts One through Four be dismissed or that the court direct the government to provide a Bill of Particulars.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument that the Superseding Indictment lacks specificity, violating Ghislaine Maxwell's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights, and requests dismissal of certain counts or additional discovery.
Key Topics:
Lack of specificity in the Superseding Indictment
Failure to provide essential facts constituting the offense charged
Request to dismiss Counts One through Four or provide a Bill of Particulars
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Laura A. Menninger - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Mark S. Cohen - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Christian R. Everdell - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Bobbi C. Sternheim - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell