File
120
Document 120-ec1-00330-PAE
AI Analysis
Summary: The witness, Conrad, is being questioned about her husband's criminal history, which she allegedly concealed during voir dire. She is also questioned about her father's employment with the Justice Department and her own involvement in a disciplinary proceeding, which she failed to disclose.
Significance: This document reveals potential juror misconduct and concealment of relevant information during voir dire, which could impact the validity of the trial outcome.
Key Topics:
Juror misconduct
Criminal history concealment
Voir dire testimony
Key People:
- Conrad - Witness/Juror being questioned
- Paul M. Daugerdas - Defendant in the case
- MR. OKULA - Attorney/Representing the court
- MR. GAIR - Attorney/Prosecutor